In a political climate where every signature is scrutinized, the humble autopen has unexpectedly taken center stage in one of the most bizarre controversies of the Biden presidency.
What is the Autopen?
The autopen is a mechanical device that replicates a person’s signature. It has been used by U.S. presidents for decades — including Thomas Jefferson, John F. Kennedy, and Barack Obama — to sign documents in their absence, typically for routine, ceremonial, or time-sensitive purposes. It’s a tool of convenience, not for important decision concerning the trajectory of the nation.
Trump’s Accusation: A Presidency by Proxy?
At a press conference President Trump claimed the Biden administration’s use of the autopen is “one of the great scandals of all time.” He suggested that many executive orders, including controversial ones involving immigration, transgender rights, and clemency, may not have been signed or even authorized by Biden himself.
“Who signed these orders, proclamations, and all of the different things that he signed that set our country so far back?” Trump asked, questioning whether the president was truly in charge.
In a follow-up post on his social media platform Truth Social, Trump doubled down:
“Other than the Rigged Presidential Election of 2020, the Biggest Scandal in American History is the ‘AUTOPEN!’ Whoever used it was usurping the power of the Presidency… They did things that a Joe Biden, of sound mind, would have never done.”
The implication: that aides — not Biden — may have used the autopen to enact policy, thereby bypassing democratic accountability.
A Scandal or Political Strategy?
These claims have prompted an investigation by the House Oversight Committee, seeking to determine who had access to the autopen and whether it was used without Biden’s full awareness. Even the Senate has reportedly launched a parallel inquiry.
But Trump’s argument is less about the legality and more about the legitimacy. If Biden’s most controversial executive orders — from opening borders to allowing transgender athletes in women’s sports — were signed without his explicit knowledge, Trump and his allies argue it reflects a dangerous erosion of presidential responsibility, and those executive orders could be revisited.
How Much is Real?
So far, no evidence has been presented showing that the autopen was used improperly or that President Biden was unaware of what was being signed in his name. Biden has not publicly responded to the allegations, and the White House has not issued an official clarification.
This is a legitimate question about who was truly steering the ship during Biden’s presidency.
What’s certain is this: autopen or not, the issue plays into a growing narrative among some conservatives — that Biden was not fully in control of his administration and that unelected staffers may have taken the reins.
Why It Matters
This controversy touches on something fundamental: transparency and trust in democratic leadership. It makes common sense to know who was truly running to country during the Biden administration and who was actually singing the many executive orders with the autopen
Subscribe to the AlainGuillot.com newsletter for daily articles on politics, personal finance, the economy, and personal development.
Previous Politics posts